Kirstie Alley has long been ridiculed over the past few years about her weight. From appearing on the failed sitcom Fat Actress to being Jenny Craig’s spokesperson, both of which ended in disaster. The National Enquirer has been dogging Kirstie through her weight gain and recently came out with a gem of a front page article stating that Kirstie Alley only has four years to live.

The Enquirer has always been known as a tabloid rag, and most stars let it roll off their backs like water on a duck — but not this time around. Apparently Kirstie’s 85 year-old Dad saw the article and called her very upset and asked her if she was dying. That infuriated Kirstie SO much, that her current obsession with Twitter helped her to show her true colors once again.

Kirstie took aim at the National Enquirer employee who wrote the article and posted some pretty nasty and threatening tweets, and asked her “Twitter buddies” to help her out.

The National Enquirer article that enraged Kirstie:

Kirstie Alley has just four years to live, an expert predicts. Locked in a deadly cycle of binge eating and yo-yo dieting, the former “Fat Actress” star has shaved years off her life span, according to doctors who have reviewed her medical history.

At 5-foot-8 and 250 pounds, the 58-year-old Emmy winner is “playing Russian roulette with her life,” warned Patrick Wanis, Ph.D., a human behavior expert from Miami Beach, Fla. “I added up the stressors in her life, and unless she adds more balance to it, Kirstie may only live to age 62.”

That frightening scenario is the conclusion of a longevity guide that he’s developed known as the “Life and Death Calculator.” The calculator determines a person’s estimated life expectancy by evaluating five principal body indicators.

“There are emotional, mental, physical, nutritional and spiritual stressors that can define how well we age,” explained Dr. Wanis, author of “Secrets to Losing Weight, Being Thin and Loving Your Body,” a set of three CDs. “We also look at relationships and how much support one gets from friends and family. Finally, we take lifestyle – where you live and the quality of life – into account.”

The former “Cheers” star – whose last serious romance ended in May 2000 when she called off her engagement to actor James Wilder – lost 75 pounds nearly three years ago as the poster girl for the Jenny Craig weight-loss program. But she’s regained some 90 pounds since then with a weakness for fat-laden Chinese takeout and other unhealthy foods.

And such a dramatic weight gain can dramatically shorten life span, according to a top anti-aging expert.

Now I don’t doubt that her weight is an issue to her health, but four years to live is a tad ridiculous. Don’t get me wrong, I am not sticking up for Kirstie in any way. It’s extremely difficult to have respect for someone who supports a cult, a cult btw, which claims to hold ALL the answers to any mental, physical or spiritual problem you might be having. Which of course, begs the question, why can’t Kirstie turn to Scientology to help her with her weight, and to a greater extent, her overall health?

Kirstie is supposedly an OTV on Scientology’s Bridge To Total Freedom and has “donated” over five million dollars to the cult in the past. Their promises of telling members that their courses and auditing will enable them to be “at cause” over everything. They also boast about having special “OT powers” and are able to cure many afflictions. *ahem, SNICKER*

It is quite obvious that Kirstie is not  “at cause” over her weight or the constant “PR flap” she continues to be for Scientology. Which couldn’t make me happier. But it is not only a problem of Kirstie being duped by the deceptions of Scientology and giving them bad PR, now she has decided to go on Twitter and go after the employee who wrote the article by asking her Twit buddies to “Fair Game” this person.

As you may or may not know, Fair Game was actually a policy written by founder L. Ron Hubbard in which he states:

Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed. October 1967 Policy Letter (HCOPL 18 Oct 67 Issue IV, Penalties for Lower Conditions)

Some snippets and Kirstie’s actual tweets were listed on Celebitchy, (of course the names and personal info were redacted):

Alley is predictably outraged about this, and claims that the cover upset her 85 year-old father. She is urging her followers on Twitter to harass an employee at the National Enquirer, who I won’t name here. Regardless Alley seems to think this woman had a hand in the story despite the fact that she’s not listed as an author at all. Alley’s tweets on the matter are ominous and she practically threatens the woman, calling her “fair game” and saying she’ll expose her photos and secrets. Alley lists the Enquirer employee’s contact information, including her e-mail and phone number, and asks people to contact her. The term “Fair Game” is used by Alley’s cult, Scientology, and refers to the practice of revealing damaging information about detractors and harassing them relentlessly until they back down.

That’s [name redacted] [phone number redacted]. [email address redacted]..

show S SOME LOVE..tell her my DADDY sent you..More news on S to follow
about 23 hours ago from web

Please call Ms. [name redacted].Your natural instinct will be to be kind.
Pretend your father just called you panicked that you were dying. Bang Bang
about 23 hours ago from web

@mladenstanisic SHe IS famous isn’t she? Now she really IS a public figure. Fair Game for Public photos and speech. Same terms as Me..lol
about 23 hours ago from web in reply to mladenstanisic

S[name redacted] …watch your back honey..two can play at the INFO and picture game and YOU are a public figure now too, girly girl..click click
10:07 AM Aug 16th from web

nasty writers dirty little secrets..and I will be happy to EXPOSE them right here on twitter. Nasty Writers beware of the truth..
10:04 AM Aug 16th from web

It also is never the answer to harm their loved ones when they are not even the target. I am NO DOVE, but I won’t hesitate to EXPOSE these
10:02 AM Aug 16th from web

IIT PROVOKES me to do the same thing to them and their families as I CAN GET THEIR PRIVATE DATA. But my religion teaches ignore and
flourish
10:00 AM Aug 16th from web

to buy this sh*t. It wreaks havoc on families and friends, just like any other bullying except it is on a world wide scale. Oo Daddy, look away
9:58 AM Aug 16th from web

I am sharing this with you because it truly is the highest form of insidious evil bullying that exists.What you CAN do about it, is refuse
9:57 AM Aug 16th from web

I don’t care for myself..If it wasn’t weight it’s been some other lies for 28 years..but it breaks my heart when my Dad worries about it..
9:56 AM Aug 16th from web

I DESPISE THE F*CKING NATIONAL ENQUIRER!!!! My 85 year old amazing father just called to ask me if “I AM DYING” Bless his heart..EVIL F*CKS
9:48 AM Aug 16th from web

Tisk Tisk! Kirstie! I would imagine both Twitter and Scientology would not be too happy about this? Twitter’s TOS is as follows and I put a WOOPS! next to all that apply to Kirstie:

You must not abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate other Twitter users. WOOPS! 

You may not use the Twitter.com service for any illegal or unauthorized purpose. WOOPS!

You are solely responsible for your conduct and any data, text, information, screen names, graphics, photos, profiles, audio and video clips, links (”Content”) that you submit, post, and display on the Twitter.com service. WOOPS!

 You must not create or submit unwanted email to any Twitter members (”Spam”). WOOPS!

You must not, in the use of Twitter, violate any laws in your jurisdiction (including but not limited to copyright laws). WOOPS!

Violation of any of these agreements will result in the termination of your Twitter.com account.  WOOPS?

So do you think Twitter suspended her account because of her threats and her telling her twittery dimwitted minions to email the employee from the National Enquirer?  Speaking of dimwitted minions… this kind of reminds me of a someone.

But Wait There’s more……

Let’s not forget that she posted this person’s personal information to boot on Twitter. It probably went totally unnoticed by Twitter’s execs, do to the fact that she is famous. When I think of all the videos that got yanked off YouTube due to Scientology flagging campaigns, this really makes my blood boil.

It’s ironic that Kirstie is lashing out about the same things that Scientology is guilty of. Now I don’t want to hear any comments from Scientologists saying that Hubbard’s Fair Game policy was canceled long ago, when we all know it has NOT been canceled AT ALL and the tactic is still employed on a daily basis by their OSA (Office of Special Affairs) task force. You know every “church” has its own goon squad and private PI’s, right?

Hey Kirstie, maybe you should give OSA a tweet!

You would think that Scientology is getting kind of sick of their precious cash cow celebrities dragging down what’s left of their failed reputation. From Cruise jumping on the couch and his psychotic and bizarre Scientology tape being leaked, where he says that Scientology is the authority on the mind and they are the only ones who can help in a car accident, among other hilarious falsehoods. Then there is total whackjob and utterly adorable (insert sarcasm) Juliette Lewis, who sounds like a cat being castrated when she sings.

Looks like her other “kitty” sings too?

And let’s not forget that Scientology twit, Jenna Elfman was quoted as saying that AIDS is just a state of mind, not a disease. I swear you can’t make this crap up.

And that poor Katie Holmes went from a vivacious girl next door, to a scary Grandma in a very short time after she married Cruise.

The list just goes on and on and on. In the interest of time and space we can’t show all of Scientology’s finest, but it boggles the mind wondering which Scientology celebrity will make cult leader David Miscavige’s head explode next? Lisa Marie Presley? Hmmmm?

It seems that celebrities have really done a number on Scientology. As much as Scientology loves to boast about what FAMOUS members they have (no other “church” has EVER done this), it seems that their celebrities have turned into one big pain in the ass for them — and coincidentally, the celebs are the only ones getting preferential treatment. Not just at the fancy Scientology Celebrity Center. As we’ve discovered, the same rules don’t apply to them as other lowly members. What a kicker! Huh Scientology members?

So to all Scientology celebrities, while I wish you all to leave the cult as soon as possible…if your are going to stay in, please keep doing exactly what you have been doing and we will all just sit back and enjoy the ride with a tub of popcorn.

Years ago a term was coined: “jumping the shark”, which derived from a “Happy Days” episode featuring Henry “The Fonz” Winkler jumping over a shark with his motorcycle. Subsequently, the show went completely down hill after that episode. But now, thanks to the crazy Tom Cruise, we have a new phrase “jumping the couch” which precedes a person’s failure. This is of course pertaining to when Cruise jumped on Oprah’s couch to profess his “love” for Katie.

Who would have ever thought that the cult itself and their precious celebrities would be their own demise? So keep tweeting Kirstie and keep jumping the couch Scientology. Karma is a sweet bitch sometimes….. ain’t it?

Source: Queen